I would research your options with the Postal Inpector, and the DA's offices in
the buyer's and sellers' jurisdictions. You can do this w/o raising a big stink.
>>> ClassicVW@xxxxxxx 04:50:45 05/21/2001 >>>
I may be getting ahead of things, but at least I'm thinking ;) . If the
seller continues to ignore Geo. W, what if we each sent the seller an email
stating something like- 'We know that your deal was a total rip-off from the
get-go and we'll __________ )' (fill in the blank with some type of threat-
like a mass emailing to eBay; or threaten to email anyone who bids on his
auctions).
Perhaps his receiving 100+ mails all at once will shake him up. It could also
have the reverse effect of further clamming him up, but if we are sure that
he's not going to answer George anyway, there's nothing to lose, IMO. Just a
thought...
George S.
gwsears@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
> He has a stern letter in his email box awaiting his return.
>
> videosareus@xxxxxxxxxxx is the seller. He has a good feedback but
> sales are mostly for $2, $3 items. Mostly used video tapes.
>
> Item #1235502129 is the first auction which I bought, BIN
>
> Item #1236528206 is what appears to be the same lens put up for
> auction on 9 May 01.
>
> At $12 shipping, I figured to to be insured but appearently not.
>
> I will do everything in my power to prevent this from happening to others.
>
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|