| Subject: | RE: [OM] OM-4T vs. OM-4Ti |
|---|---|
| From: | Scott Gomez <scott@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 16 May 2001 09:38:38 -0700 |
...those being a fine example of T, assuming they're "mounted correctly". --- Scott Gomez -----Original Message----- From: Bruce Kolber [mailto:bkolber@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Subject: Re: [OM] OM-4T vs. OM-4Ti and then there are T-back bathing suits.... Bruce Kolber St. Petersburg, FL 33715 USA < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] 50mmf1.8, Chris Stinson |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [OM] 50mmf1.8, Mark Hammons |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] OM-4T vs. OM-4Ti, Bruce Kolber |
| Next by Thread: | [OM] OM 35Sp Problem, Wayne Katez |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |