Dear CH,
I saw the differences. The 55mm 1.2 is definitely warmer than the 50mm 1.2.
Thankyou for this demonstration.
The 50mm f1.2 is one of the rarer lenses, like the 90mm f2 as I have not
seen one for sale in the last 3 months of looking. Is it really worth the
money? The radioactivity thing is not that worrying; and the cast I can
handle. I have so many standard lenses I think that I would be admitting to
Zuikoholism if I buy a 50mm 1.2.
Do you think it offers alot above a 55 1.2, or 50 1.4?
----- Original Message -----
From: "C.H.Ling" <chling@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, May 13, 2001 1:51 PM
Subject: Re: [OM] 55mm f/1.2 [was: Re: olympus-digest V2 #2405]
> Hi Oben,
>
> Did you use slide or negative? Below you can see the different between the
> test shot I made with 50/1.2 and 55/1.2, both at F4. They were scanned
with
> LS2000 without any adjustment. At the same time, I had also tested the
> 50/3.5s, 50/1.4s, 21/2 and 35-70/3.6 the 55/1.2 is warmer than all of
them.
>
> http://www.glink.net.hk/~gallery2/50-12.jpg
>
> http://www.glink.net.hk/~gallery2/55-12.jpg
>
> C.H.Ling
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Oben Candemir" <dunya@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> > Gary,
> >
> > Is there a determined or known serial number after which radioactivity
> > ceases?
> >
> > I also read CH Ling mention a yellow cast to his photos from this lens.
I
> > have taken many many photos with mine and even though the front element
> has
> > a deep yellow orange single coating I have never seen a yellow cast to
the
> > highlights in my photos.
> >
>
>
>
>
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|
