ML Archiv: Re: [OM] 85/2 vs 90/2

Subject:	Re: [OM] 85/2 vs 90/2
From:	"Barry B. Bean" <bbbean@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Tue, 08 May 2001 12:58:50 -0500 (CDT)

On Sat, 5 May 2001 19:01:02 +0800, Clemente Colayco wrote:

>What about comparison between an 85/2 and the 90/2?
>
>With just 5 mm difference in focal length, what else could be the
>difference?

Macro ability
-
B.B. Bean                                       bbbean@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Bean & Bean Cotton Co/Bean Farms                http://www.beancotton.com
Peach Orchard, MO

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[OM] 85/2 vs 90/2, (continued) [OM] 85/2 vs 90/2, Clemente Colayco Re: [OM] 85/2 vs 90/2, frieder . faig Re: [OM] 85/2 vs 90/2, Chris Barker Re: [OM] 85/2 vs 90/2, T . Clausen Re: [OM] 85/2 vs 90/2 --- Macro calculations for 85/2, frieder . faig Re: [OM] 85/2 vs 90/2, John A. Lind [OM] slide copier, Clyde Soles Re: [OM] slide copier, Hans van Veluwen Re: [OM] slide copier, Clyde Soles Re: [OM] slide copier, Hans van Veluwen Re: [OM] 85/2 vs 90/2, Barry B. Bean <= Re: [OM] 100/2 vs 90/2, Joel Wilcox Re: [OM] 100/2 vs 90/2, andrew fildes Re: [OM] 100/2 vs 90/2, Alan Re: [OM] 100/2 vs 90/2, C.H.Ling

Previous by Date:	Re: [OM] Everyone's Film of Choice, Barry B. Bean
Next by Date:	Re: [OM][OT] Forwarded- Ebay & Paypal.com- The Good and the Bad, Winsor Crosby
Previous by Thread:	Re: [OM] slide copier, Hans van Veluwen
Next by Thread:	Re: [OM] 100/2 vs 90/2, Joel Wilcox
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]