Older 4s had a tendency to shift asa settings when the compensation dial was
used. If you compare a T to an old 4 you'll note that the knurled part of
the asa dial is about 1 mm taller than the old version.
John Hermanson
___________________________________
http://www.zuiko.com
Camtech, Olympus Service since 1977.
21 South Lane, Huntington NY 11743-4714
Phone/fax 631-424-2121
Free Olympus Manuals: 1-800-221-3000
___________________________________
----- Original Message -----
From: <frieder.faig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, May 07, 2001 2:22 PM
Subject: Re: [OM] OM-4 Test Pictures
| On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 09:44:49AM -0500, Joel Wilcox wrote:
| > Hi Oben,
| >
| >
| > Hello? I have never had this problem with the OM-4T exposure comp dial.
I
| > had thought the OM-2(x) exposure comp placement was ideal until I was
| > shooting from brackets handheld with the OM-4T and wanted to keep the
| > composition exact. The OM-4T is extremely deft for this. Perhaps the
dial
| > has been improved from the 4 to the 4T?
|
| When I rememer it correctly, then did Olympus made some changes on
| the exposure comp.-dial. The change was introduced in the later produced
OM4's
| and kept for the T[i]-Models.
|
| >
| > >
| > >3. The OM4 eats batteries like there's no tomorrow. I can't keep up
with
| > >its
| > >appetite and I have gotten sick of removing and replacing the
batteries.
| >
| > That's a bummer. My OM-4T is my best body for batteries.
|
| This is another change during the OM 4 evolution.
|
|
| Frieder Faig
|
|
|
| < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
| < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
| < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|
|
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|