You can check Modern Photography test report at:
http://brashear.phys.appstate.edu/lhawkins/photo/mp-zuiko-tests.txt
which shown 100/2 is better at wide aperture, I'm not interested on
photodo's report, the 28/2 owner will tell how they love the lens, but
check the result in photodo, it is almost the poorest fixed lens.
C.H.Ling
Alan wrote:
C.H.Ling,
<snip>
Anyways, photodo (which has many flaws) happens to have mtf test results for
the 90f2 and 100f2. One thing htat I have always criticize photodo
numbers is
they are only useful at infinity (sort of the inverse criticism of Gary's
numbers) if you assume that lens performance is not uniform from 1:10 to
1:infinity.
<snip>
So much for theory vs practice.
> Alan
That is interesting. They give the same rating, 2.6, to the 28/2,
which is as good as anyone's good lens, and the 200/4! Their rating
does seem to be somewhat divorced from reality.
Winsor
--
Winsor Crosby
Long Beach, California, USA
mailto:wincros@xxxxxxxxxxx
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|