Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] 100/2 vs 90/2

Subject: Re: [OM] 100/2 vs 90/2
From: "Tom Scales" <tscales@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 5 May 2001 19:52:49 -0500
It's funny, the 75-150 takes such a beating, yet almost everyone here that
owns one simply loves it and continually finds new uses for it.

Tom

> I do found there is magic on some lenses, so far I found the 75-150 and
> 180/2.8 the best lens for portrait. I have used the 85/2 a lot in the pass
> (because this was the only short I have at that time), but all with
> negative, they are also fine but can't comment on the color. But the
75-150
> do provide creamy and saturated color, resolution is not bad either, as a
> multi elements single coated lens it may not perform well in backlight,
the
> distortion of this lens at both end is also very high, but for portrait it
> is excellent especially in studio where you don't need to care about the
DOF
> effect. Because at F4 you need to use the longer end of this lens to get
> better out of focus effect.
>
> C.H.Ling
>



< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz