I've never seen a magenta cast on Kodachrome. Snow, rivers, bush, never a
megenta cast. This is why I like it. That's why I didn't take Ektachrome to
Antarctica (which does have a magenta cast). And the slide mounts are
plastic here. And the processing is good. It seems that the US has a lot
more problems than we do with Kodachrome.
Foxy
----- Original Message -----
2. re:Kodachrome. Sure, it's a unique film and we will be poorer without it,
but let's be realistic. It has some faults. The first is lousy processing. I
don't know a single professional photographer that continues to use
Kodachrome exclusively, due to poor processing by Kodak. Crummy cardboard
mounts aside, could they possibly get more dust, water spots, and scratches
on it?
What about color? I know I'm not the only one that is sick of the magenta
cast that the 64 and 200 versions give.
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|