Frieder,
Thanks for the data, I found OM4 is one of the fastest camera I have
ever touch. The data of Leica and Contax electronics one are very
close to what I found (feel). I have tried a 167MT and R7, they were
much slower than my OM4. I just thought the R6.2 would be faster, but
according to the data it seems not.
C.H.Ling
frieder.faig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Yes, it is a important quality of a camera. I´ve collected some values at:
>
> http://studweb.studserv.uni-stuttgart.de/studweb/users/mas/mas12462/OM/Ausloeseverzoegerung.html
>
> Up to now, I´ve only values for the OM4. I´d be happy to find more to add.
> My guess is that OM 1 & OM 3 are somewhat faster (pure mechanic), and that
> OM 40 and OM 2sp are somewhat slower (program capability - thanks to
> C.H.Ling).
> But It was a OM 40, which turned me into the OM way because of its fast
> reaction ;-).
>
> There is a timing diagram of the OM 1 in the web:
> http://www.mir.com.my/rb/photography/hardwares/classics/olympusom1n2/om1/index2.htm
>
> regards,
> Frieder Faig
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|