ML Archiv: Re: [OM] focus

Olympus-OM

Re: [OM] focus - off

from Thomas Bryhn

Subject:	Re: [OM] focus - off
From:	Thomas Bryhn <thomas.bryhn@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Wed, 04 Apr 2001 10:45:08 +0200

At 11:27 04.04.01 +1000, Wayne wrote:

Thomas wrote:
> I want to add that the photographic emulsion is in fact at the back ofthe film,
I don't think so.

You're absolutely right, of course. Forget all I said, the emulsion is infront, that's why sheet film needs a standardized thickness.


Regards,
Thomas Bryhn


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: [OM] focus - off, (continued) Re: [OM] focus - off, Ian A. Nichols Re: [OM] focus - off, Michael Gardner Re: [OM] focus - off, Chris O'Neill Re: [OM] focus - off, Ian A. Nichols Re: [OM] focus - off, Thomas Bryhn Re: [OM] focus - off, C.H.Ling Re: Re: [OM] focus - off, Chris O'Neill Re: Re: [OM] focus - off, Ian A. Nichols Re: Re: [OM] focus - off, John Hermanson Re: [OM] focus - off, wayneharridge Re: [OM] focus - off, Thomas Bryhn <=

Previous by Date:	Re: [OM] ...now: alternatives to PM-MTob, HI100
Next by Date:	*Re: [OM] First piece of junk from Bay*, Doggre*
Previous by Thread:	Re: [OM] focus - off, wayneharridge
Next by Thread:	[OM] Re: olympus-digest V2 #2311, Vaughan Bromfield
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]