What's amazing is how technology is improving 35mm photography, which has
been around forever. I shoot just normal 100ASA print film, scan it and
print it on a photoprinter at 13x19. While I'm sure the difference at 1
foot, or with a loop, would be quite obvious, at a normal viewing distance
even the inkjet prints are stunning.
I admit, I'm ready to switch to digital when it can match the quality. The
effort to take the picture, get the film developed and scan the negs it a
lot. Digital is the dream, but it still can't match the quality.
OM content -- all the film is shot with OM, of course!
Tom
> Wow! BTW, everybody else probably already knows this, but I recently
> received some 16x20's that are unlike anything I've seen before. *No*
> grain, and sharp as a razor. I'd wager that 30x40's would be just as
> stunning. -4T, tripod, prefire, Zuiko 35-70/3.5-4.5 and 21/3.5, f-8 to
11,
> 1/4 to 1/8 sec., Ilford Pan F (50 ISO). And I'm really sorry Agfa dropped
> APX 25.
> JP
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|