Tom, I'm curious what value you put in this auction. I put in my usual
lowball bid but it was too low. /jnm
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Tom Scales
> Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2001 4:54 AM
> To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [OM] A pleasant surprise
>
>
> I knew it was a 100/2, which was why I bid. Now that I relook at the
> auction, I can see that it is a 1n, I just didn't catch it at first. I
> actually bid based on a 1MD, so this was just a nice 'extra'.
>
> Tom
>
> >
> >
> >
> > Hi Tom
> >
> > You could see in the photo with that auction that it was an
> OM-1n, and the
> > 100mm/f2 was described as 100mm 1:2 (obviously copied direct from the
> > lens)....description was not the seller's strong point...
> >
> > regards
> > Roger Key
>
>
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|