From: "Hans van Veluwen" <hcvanveluwen@xxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [OM] Rolleicord / Rolleiflex (Re: OM's at Goodwill) [OT]
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 13:29:31 +0100
: I have never found an Olympus OM at Goodwill either, but last week I
bought
: a Rolleicord for $39 at a Goodwill. It is from 1936.... Had an old, old
: steel 120 "sprocket" in the camera from way back.... I'd bet it hasn't
been
: used in 30 years.. I just got back a roll of film from it, and it works
: perfectly. Doesn't need the slightest CLA.
:
:
: I also feel that everyone who appreciates the Olympus OM line owes it to
: themself to buy, or borrow a Rolleicord or Rolleiflex for a while. It
: changes the way you think about taking photos.....the whole process is
just
: enjoyable. They can be had for the same price as a 100/2.8, and they are
: incredibly well made, great to use, and just fun, fun, fun.
Yesterday I saw a very nice Rolleicord kit and am now tempted. It all
looked
mint, NIB. Even the original box of the camera was included, an everready
case,
a boxed teleconverter pair, about two dozen of boxed filters, two old
lightmeters (I think they were included). The camera was one of the later
versions I believe (IV or V). They wanted Hfl. 575 ($234) for it. Is that a
good
price? What are the major differences between Rolleicords and Rolleiflexes?
I
know the latter were much more expensive, but also much more better? How
usable
are the built-in lightmeters from 30+ year old TLR's?
hnz
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >