I believe that the macro only works at 60mm, so it is really a 1:1.5 60mm/f3.8
macro. I would prefer to use my zuiko 50mm/3.5 macro, but the benefit of the
zoom macro is that you have a macro without an additional lens to carry. I would
regard the facility as 'nice to have', but not as good as a proper macro lens...
mvh / regards
Roger Key
>Here's some questions/thoughts. Please comment.
>Is this a feature at the expense of overall performance?
>Are the results any good?
>Seems like they are too slow/dark viewfinder to focus accurately.
>Why would you want a 300 macro? Seems like 135 would be plenty.
>Wouldn't a 50 macro+tube or 85/2+tube, etc. be better?
>Or even a tube on any close focusing lens. (Maybe I ought to experiment
>with the 35-70/3.5-4.5)
>As you can see I'm a little dubious of the value of this feature.
>Mike
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|