I'll bet the seller is Matt BenDaniel <matt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>. I think that the
all-sky astrophoto is his at the bottom of the ad.
He may have deduced, as I did, that the lens is just too expensive and too
specialized to keep $1000+ tied up. I liked mine, but I didn't have an
overwhelming need to keep it. The spherical VR work that I intended for it can
be accomplished with the 16/3.5 Zuiko just as well. You just need more images
from the 16mm to accomplish the same image coverage as with the 8mm.
Skip
Original Message:
-----------------
From: Dirk Wright wright@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2001 13:26:02 -0500
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [OM] 8mm 2.8 on ebay
>For those looking to fill out their Zuiko collection, you might find
>this interesting:
>
>http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=1221656492
>
>No connection with the seller.
>
>
Is the seller a list member? I notice he/she references Hanz's esif web
site....
--
Be Seeing You.
Dirk Wright
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Mail2Web - Check your email from the web at
http://www.mail2web.com/ .
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|