Recently I sold my OM-2S (bought new in 1985) after I bought a 4Ti; I sold the
2S for $225, and bought the 4Ti for $170, so it was a pretty good deal! To me
the 4Ti seems to be much more versatile, apart from the program mode. I
frequently use the spot function on the 4Ti in auto mode, often just a single
spot. I can not see why the 2S can be better..but I must admit to really liking
the 2S. Now I have a 2n as backup to the 4Ti; very cheap ($30 !) and no battery
problems.
mvh / regards
Roger Key
>My dream Olympus camera would be the OM-3/4 body, mirror, and shutter
>mechanism with the OM-2S's spot metering and viewfinder display. I find
>that having a single spot meter that is the default metering mode is more
>useful than average or multispot metering. Getting the correct exposure is
>easier for me if I can accurately meter just one small area of the frame.
>Barry
> Just out of curiosity, what specifically makes the 2s superior to the
> 4(ti)? I have a 2s and a 4, and I find that the 4 has greater low-light
> metering capabilities. Do you find the 2s to give more accurate exposures
> with auto?
> Eric
>
>> The OM-2S is, in my humble opinion, superior to the
>> OM-4(ti) in handheld photography and E-6 photography.
>> The OM-4(ti) has an edge with the multispot metering
>> in B&W and complex lighting conditions.
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|