Just saw a new technique that is non invasive. I think maybe it uses a CT
scan. I really wasn't paying that much attention, you know, if you ignore
it, it might go away. Maybe by the time the Doc says I need to get one,
the methodology will have changed. So far, so good!
Gregg
Oh gawd - you would have to mention these - got rear-ended by an endoscope
yesterday. They even let you watch the monitor these days - a very strange
experience. Unfortunately, it was a Pentax outfit (I've been rogered by a
Pentax - I feel so DIRTY!) I'm not going next time (3 years) unless they
replace it with a decent, god-fearing Olympus.
Andrew
>No. I think it is an eyepiece for some kind of medical instrument - maybe an
>endoscope?
>
>
>hnz
>
>
>< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
>< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
>< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|