Thanks George. Is the OM1 tougher than the OM2n? I believe the 1 is ten
grams lighter than the OM2n. Not much, but something. John.
On Tue, 6 Mar 2001 21:08:57 EST ClassicVW@xxxxxxx writes:
> Having owned just about every OM, (and I still have two OM-Gs), I
> like them
> very much, they work very well, are more reliable than it's cousin,
> the
> OM-10, BUT I wouldn't want to bang one against a rock or something.
> Much
> plastic, as you mention. Forget about it surviving a fall, IMO. I
> know no one
> 'plans' on dropping their camera, but unless you consider the 'G'
> 'disposable' and don't care what happens, an OM-1 would be a much
> much better
> choice. Hold a '-1' and a 'G' in your hands and you'll know what I
> mean.
> Regards,
> George S.
>
> > I'm trying to put together a very light kit for backpacking. I see
> that
> > the OMG is the lightest body. I'm sure there's lots of plastic.
> Just
> > wondering what experience people have had with it? Thanks, John
> from
> > Olympia, WA.
> >
>
>
>^..^<
MAGGIE
LIVES!!!
________________________________________________________________
GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO!
Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less!
Join Juno today! For your FREE software, visit:
http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj.
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|