Intersting Tom, for my use I find the 70-150 f3.5
Tamron to neatly accomplish most of my tele needs.
It's 3/4's the focal length of a 200 and uses a 49mm
filter size. I suppose the 75-150 f4 Zuiko would fit
in here to. Just wish I could find a 1.5x extender for
the Tamron for when I need a bit more reach
--- Tom Scales <tscales@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> We think alike. I owned both the 200/4 and 200/5,
> but found myself tossing
> the 200/5 in my bag more often because of it's size.
> Once I bought the
> 180/2.8, the 200/4 got sold. When I need speed,
> that's my lens.
>
> Tom
> From: "Barry B. Bean" <bbbean@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>
> > Nice lens, although I prefer the 200/5 for weight
> and the 180/2.8 for
> > speed.
> >
> > BB
> > -
>
>
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing
> List >
> < For questions,
> mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page:
> http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail.
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|