Well, I own both (any jaws dropping to the floor in surprise?). Mostly they
are just ---- different.
The 75-150 is smaller and a little faster. The 100-200 covers a higher
range at the top. In the end, it just comes down to what I am using them
for. For a general purpose 'walking around' zoom, I almost always go for
the 75-150. For a lightweight soccer zoom, I go for the 100-200.
Both nice lenses, at the economy end of the OM scale. Both fairly
inexpensive.
If I just could have one, it would be the 75-150.
Tom
From: "Chris O'Neill" <coneill@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Just out of curiosity, how do the 100-200/5 and the 75-150/4 compare to
> each other?
>
> Yeah, yeah, I know... the 100-200 is slower and a bit longer. It's also
a
> one-touch zoom where the 75-150/4 is a two-touch zoom. But, besides that,
> how do they compare? Is one "crisper" than the other? Which one gives
> better bokah? Is one easier to handle?
>
> Real-life comparisons are preferred, please.
>
> Regards,
>
> Chris
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|