GS, that's what i meant, that the "hiding in the O" of the sensor could be
purely for cosmetic reasons, instead of having the sensor out in plain
view. sorry for not being clear.
On Thu, 8 Feb 2001 ClassicVW@xxxxxxx wrote:
>The sensor IS inside the "O". One of my flashes is missing the "olympus"
>plate on the front, and the sensor hole where the "O" would be is definitely
>there.
>
>George S.
>
>siddim01@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
>
><< you mean the thingy hidden inside the "O" on the T20/32? it could very
> well be cosmetic, no? acceptance angle is still equivalent to FOV of a
> 35 or 24mm lens, respectively.
> >>
>
>< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
>< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
>< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
/Acer V
--
dum spiro, spero
http://student.ucr.edu/~siddim01
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|