Subject: | [OM] f/2 vs f/2.8-which are better? |
---|---|
From: | "alpinist" <alpinist@xxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Wed, 7 Feb 2001 17:53:10 -0600 |
Which are the better Zuiko's to have the f/2 or f/2.8 lenses? I shoot landscapes and work on a tripod, so speed does not really matter. Are the 2's better lenses than the 2.8's? or just faster? I was looking at the 24mm and 100mm focal lengths and a search of OM mt lenses came up like New Vivitar's around $100 New Sigmas around $180 Used Zuiko 2.8 around $200 New Zuiko 2.8 $300+ Used Zuiko 2 $450 New Zuiko 2 $700 Hold out for new 2's or would something else cut it? |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [OM] A pro using Olympus, Stephen Troy |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] a new web page!, John A. Lind |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] A pro using Olympus, Stephen Troy |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] f/2 vs f/2.8-which are better?, Jim Couch |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |