| Subject: | Re: [OM] 135/2.8 MC value |
|---|---|
| From: | Gary Reese <pcacala@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 06 Feb 2001 08:22:42 -0800 |
Mike V. writes: << I did not know what the going rate was for one in very good condition. >> Depends on what you call "very good." That is typically pretty low on the scale. Perhaps KEH=BGN ??? Gary Reese Las Vegas, NV < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] OT Global warming, Garth Wood |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [OM] OT - N*k*n FM3A, Rich Lahrson |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] 135/2.8 MC value, c.e.packard |
| Next by Thread: | [OM] Manual Minolta Free and MOM: from the Mouth of Minolta, Peter Blaise Monahon |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |