Hi Rand,
You are right, the IS series converter was discuss a few times in the
pass, but I have never buy one until two days before I bought a 1.7x
B300 converter for my E-10. The B300 caused some vignetting on the
E-10, I have to chop the image from 2240 to 2000 pixel horizontal. But
it do look very nice on the viewfinder when mounted on the 135/3.5. I
think it will become a 230/3.5, a nice combination if you don't want
to bring too many gears. I don't know how it work with other lenses,
can someone requote their experience?
C.H.Ling
rtomcala wrote:
>
> I just got an Olympus IS/L A-200 H.Q. Converter 1.5X and naturally,
> the thought comes to mind "It's 49mm, on the IS cameras there is no
> appreciable light loss, so why not OM too ?"
> I'm sure this must have been addressed (and tried) before.
> Curious,
> Rand E.
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|