Subject: | Re: [OM] 350 f2.5 ED-not 350mm f2.8..was there ever one? |
---|---|
From: | Gary Reese <pcacala@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Tue, 30 Jan 2001 10:25:49 -0800 |
John R. writes: << So Gary-this is a true statement? No such thing as "350 f2.5 ED"? >> It's not even a prototype to anyone's knowledge. Most likely a mistake in Michael McBroom's note taking. Gary Reese Las Vegas, NV < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Photo of the Day, Chris Barker |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Photo of the Day, Chris Barker |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] 350 f2.5 ED-not 350mm f2.8..was there ever one?, Pandionhalietius |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: Subjective Lens analysis, miaim |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |