Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] OM 21mm or 24mm??

Subject: Re: [OM] OM 21mm or 24mm??
From: "Barry B. Bean" <bbbean@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 08:31:24 -0600 (CST)
On Mon, 29 Jan 2001 17:52:18 -0800, Mike Lazzari wrote:

>So... What do I get? I already have a 28mm 3.5 so if i went for the 24mm
>2.8 I could sell the 28mm as redundant and save a little $$. If I got
>the 21 I might keep the 28 costing much more overall. 

I have all three, and the 21 and 28 get the most use. The 21 is an
incredible lens, and perfect for that ultrawide-but-not-fisheye look.
The 28, as you know, is a great wide-normal lens, and a joy to work
with hyperfocal. 

userb3
-
B.B. Bean                                       bbbean@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Bean & Bean Cotton Co/Bean Farms                http://www.beancotton.com
Peach Orchard, MO


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz