This is what a tried to say C.H.Ling.
With E-10 will reach at least at the same
Zuiko quality, if not even more. The problem
here are spherical aberrations. I´ve readed
everything about this camera, and I can
assure you, you won´t be dissapointed with
it.
Great photos C.H.Ling, specially the bee
one!!! Wow.
Dave
"C.H.Ling" wrote:
>
> Below is a preliminary comparison between E10 and Zuiko:
>
> Technical details -
>
> Film: Kodak Gold 100
> Lens: Zuiko 35-105 at 105mm f5.6 ~1/90s
> Camera: OM2sp
> Scanner: Nikon LS2000 at 2700dpi, Nikon scanner drive Ver. 2.5.
>
> (all files size 137K to 269K)
>
> Original Zuiko shot shrink to 760 pixel horizontal.
>
> http://www.glink.net.hk/~gallery/park-z.jpg
>
> Chopped original scan of Zuiko at 2700dpi
>
> http://www.glink.net.hk/~gallery/park-z-o.jpg
>
> Original E-10 shot (1/200s f4) shrink to 760 pixel hroizontal.
>
> http://www.glink.net.hk/~gallery/park-e.JPG
>
> Original E-10 shot chopped.
>
> http://www.glink.net.hk/~gallery/park-e-o.JPG
>
> Will make a better comparision web later, sorry for the rought report.
> Although 2700dpi is not enough to get out all the data from the film but it
> is clear that Zuiko with a consumer film still perform much better.
>
> C.H.Ling
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
--
------------------------------------------------------------
Unofficial Olympus web page
http://victorian.fortunecity.com/byzantium/656/index.html
Unofficial Olympus Gallery
http://www.taiga.ca/~gallery/subpages/irissari/irissari.html
------------------------------------------------------------
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|
