ML Archiv: Re: [OM] second body

Subject:	Re: [OM] second body
From:	Doggre@xxxxxxx
Date:	Thu, 18 Jan 2001 02:21:23 EST

In a message dated 1/17/01 10:24:14 PM Pacific Standard Time, 
litefoot@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:

> I like the analogy between Ferraris and your OM2, "a photographic Ferrari!".
>  Let me add, can we not compare Ferrari's with women??

Oh, Juanita, I'm not going to touch that one.  Oh, what the hell.  Yes.

Rich

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: [OM] second body, (continued) Re: [OM] second body, ClassicVW Re: [OM] second body, Motor Sport Visions Photography Re: [OM] second body, Ken Norton RE: [OM] second body, Timpe, Jim RE: [OM] second body, Ian A. Nichols Re: [OM] second body, Doggre Re: [OM] second body, JUANITA M. ALMEDA Re: [OM] second body, Ray Moth Re: [OM] second body, Doggre Re: [OM] second body, ClassicVW Re: [OM] second body, Doggre <= Re: [OM] second body, JUANITA M. ALMEDA RE: [OM] second body, Scott Nelson RE: [OM] second body, Timpe, Jim RE: [OM] second body, Timpe, Jim Re: [OM] second body, Tom Scales Re: [OM] second body, Motor Sport Visions Photography Re: [OM] second body, JUANITA M. ALMEDA RE: [OM] second body, Ken Norton RE: [OM] second body, Bill Brooks RE: [OM] second body, Andrew Fildes

Previous by Date:	Re: [OM] Film to flange distance in various OM bodies, clintonr
Next by Date:	Re: RE : [OM] HIDING YOUR CAMERA BRAND?, Doggre
Previous by Thread:	Re: [OM] second body, ClassicVW
Next by Thread:	Re: [OM] second body, JUANITA M. ALMEDA
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]