ML Archiv: Re: [OM] second body

Subject:	Re: [OM] second body
From:	"Terry and Tracey" <foxcroft@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Tue, 16 Jan 2001 21:26:40 +1100

4Ti. But you will never use it with the ultimate - the 1n.

Foxy (totally unbiased)


----- Original Message ----- 
>
> well, if my first body is an OM 1-n MD, what should the second be?
> 



< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: [OM] Lycos Copyright Infringement, (continued) Re: [OM] Lycos Copyright Infringement, Richard Keefer Re: [OM] Lycos Copyright Infringement, John A. Lind Re: [OM] second body, Richard Keefer RE: [OM] second body, James N. McBride Re: [OM] second body, Winsor Crosby Re: [OM] second body, Chris O'Neill Re: [OM] second body, John A. Lind Re: [OM] second body, Chris O'Neill Re: [OM] second body, John A. Lind Re: [OM] second body, Kam Re: [OM] second body, Terry and Tracey <= Re: [OM] Lycos Copyright Infringement, Andrew Fildes Re: [OM] Lycos Copyright Infringement, WKato Re: [OM] Lycos Copyright Infringement, DaEyeGuy [OM] Lycos Copyright Infringement, Olaf Greve Re: [OM] Lycos Copyright Infringement, Daan Kalmeijer Re: [OM] Lycos Copyright Infringement, Hans van Veluwen Re: [OM] Lycos Copyright Infringement, Garth Wood Re: [OM] Lycos Copyright Infringement, Ian A. Nichols Re: [OM] Lycos Copyright Infringement, Hans van Veluwen Re: [OM] Lycos Copyright Infringement, Motor Sport Visions Photography

Previous by Date:	Re: [OM] 50mm Lens Versions (again), Chuck Norcutt
Next by Date:	Re: Re: [OM] 50/2 macro vs. 90/2 macro, Terry and Tracey
Previous by Thread:	Re: [OM] second body, Kam
Next by Thread:	Re: [OM] Lycos Copyright Infringement, Andrew Fildes
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]