Subject: | [OM] Close-up lenses |
---|---|
From: | *- DORIS FANG -* <sfsttj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Mon, 15 Jan 2001 12:23:39 -0500 (EST) |
I know it's been discussed here before, but if someone could steer me to URLs or posts that addressed the issue of how some lenses do better with high-quality achromat CU lenses than with tubes, and most importantly WHY, I'd appreciate it. Please reply off-list. *= Doris Fang =* < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] The London Eye, Chris O'Neill |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] is this distortion? what kind?, WKato |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Serial #s [was] Lens Coatings, John A. Lind |
Next by Thread: | RE: [OM] Serial #s [was] Lens Coatings, Chip Stratton |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |