Albert -
See Gary Reese's Lens Test page it contains really good info.
http://members.aol.com/olympusom/lenstests/default.htm
I own both a 28 f/3.5 and 24 f/2.8 and considered each to be excellent
wide-angle lenes. I find the 28 to be slightly better for setting up
quick shots. The 24 (which I've had for only a few months) takes a
little more planning and fiddling to get the perspective right. IMHO I'd
take both each on its own body. ;-)
Charles Packard
Albert Yang wrote:
>
> I am going to Taiwan, and so I want to take lots of pics, and I want
> to add a wide angle lens to the bag before I head out.
>
> I see that the 28mm are cheap compared to the 24mm's... So a had a
> few questions...
>
> Do you see any barrelling in the 24mm at all? I've seen some high
> quality lenses (Zeiss) which doesn't show any distortion at all, and
> I have seen some crappy 24mm lenses (some old C*non stuff) which
> should considerable barrelling at this length of lens. I would like
> the widest lens possible, but not at the cost of distortion...
>
> My second question then would be, how much of a different between the
> 24mm am I going to notice with a 28mm? Also, how is the quality (in
> general) of the 28mm f3.5?
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|