Subject: | Re: [OM] 4Ti Oh, Oh - revisited |
---|---|
From: | WKato@xxxxxxx |
Date: | Thu, 04 Jan 2001 18:44:56 EST |
<<<I always thought that the white eye syndrome was actually the flash reflection off the back of the eye's lens. Doesn't seem to happen as much as red eye, I assume due to the need for a very specific angle of reflection. That would depend on the subject looking directly at the camera lens, and the flash/distance ratio providing the correct angle of reflection. Just my crazy idea... Mickey >>> Not so crazy but I don't know the cause. I got a lot of white eye with a Vivitar 200/3, T-32 with zoom extender, and ISO 400 film at a school stage event with the stage about 60 feet away. Warren < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] 4Ti Oh, Oh - revisited, Mickey Trageser |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] 4Ti Oh, Oh - revisited, Mickey Trageser |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] 4Ti Oh, Oh - revisited, Giles |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] 4Ti Oh, Oh - revisited, Mickey Trageser |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |