Jim Timpe wrote:
FOUL!! I assumed that the non-zuiko had to at least be OM mount!!!
====================================================================
Just goes to show, Jim, you shouldn't jump to conclusions! Maybe it's
fair game and Leitz, Zeiss, Angenieux and a few other beauties can be
included. My own vote (non-OM) would be for the Leitz Elamrit-R 60mm
macro, which has beaucoup bokeh (buckets of it, actually). In fact, if
you forget you've got the extension tube mounted and try to use it as a
normal lens, bokeh is ALL you're gonna see ;-)
I agree with you, though, I feel sure the question's meant to apply
only to OM compatibles. I must admit, I don't have a favourite
non-Zuiko in OM mount but I DO have a particularly sh*tty Vivitar
70-210/4.5-5.6 zoom (OM mount), which creeps when tilted and rattles
when shaken, and has made me vow never again to buy non-Z for my OMs.
Regards,
=====
Ray
"The trouble with resisting temptation is
you never know when you'll get another chance!"
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Photos - Share your holiday photos online!
http://photos.yahoo.com/
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|