jldasch@xxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
<< Again, my point is that the miniscule differences in top lenses are an
insignificant factor in producing photographic art. You have used
logically inconsistent reasoning to claim that I took a position which
I did not.
>>
Well, you stated it a bit more understandably that time. It certainly did not
sound that way previously, and I wasn't the only one to feel this way. You
were way too heavy on the mathematical construction of lenses as their
deciding factor of "3D". NOW you're talking about "art". I did not see any
reference to "art" previously, only "physics" and "mathematical codes".
Regards,
George S.
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|