Gary,
His name is Patrick Riley, I am waiting to see if he can
correct the situation, maybe others have dealt with him on this list and
can give feedback either negative or positive but at this point I will
have to just wait and see how he handles it. I definitely think his
grading is way off. I sort of knew this could happen because everything
was described as "mint" or LN with no other details.
Frank
On Wed, 27 Dec 2000 08:40:11 -0800 Gary Reese <pcacala@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
writes:
> Hi Frank:
>
> << It was advertised as LN but it is more like EX cosmetically with
> a
> bad meter . . . I also bought the f280 flash from same seller that
> was
> advertised as LN but is more like Bargain >>
>
> Sorry to hear about your grade inflation problems. You ought to post
> the
> name of that seller here.
>
> << Does anyone know about what it would cost to get the light meter
> adjusted on an OM-4t. >>
>
> Is the error linear or non-linear? If linear, then the error may be
> adjustable. If non-linear (differs unpredictably at varying light
> levels), it probably needs a replacement photocell. I have one like
> the
> latter. In the case of the latter, you are probably looking at the
> flat
> rate charge from Olympus America, plus replacement parts. Just call
> an
> Olympus repair facility to get the estimate and be prepared for over
> $125.
>
> Gary Reese
> Las Vegas, NV
>
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|