Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Re Digital vs Traditional Photography

Subject: Re: [OM] Re Digital vs Traditional Photography
From: Andrew Fildes <afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2000 08:40:41 +1100
I've found that using a didge, or scanning negs, increases my creative
input because I can now dodge, burn and crop so easily in Photoshop when
before I could not afford the time or cost of setting up a colour darkroom.
Now, I'm just waiting for the quality.
Andrew

>If one uses a digital camera, even one as apparently high quality as the new
>E-10, does one give up the creative control that selection of photographic
>film allows?  In other words, is "point & shoot" image rendition inherent in
>the digital/electronic camera due to the photographer's lack of choice of
>"palette" in the media used to record the image?
>
>The reference to Photoshop was made to imply the need for software to achieve
>the color temperature desired, not necessarily to complain about it's cost.  
>Hey, it is disingenuous to argue about spending money if you admit infection
>with Zuiko-virus.
>
>Dave Dougherty




< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz