The newest full version Photoshop (or even version 5) can be gotten easily on
the web for free.
Larry
Tom Scales wrote:
> I don't own an E10, but I do own a Kodak DC290. I also scan, scan, scan my
> 35mm.
>
> You need something. You don't have to choose Photoshop and there are a lot
> less expensive alternatives, but you definately need a good editing program.
>
> I would also suggest spending the $79 for a Wacom graphics tablet (comes
> with a worthless cordless mouse). If you really want control, this is great
> for cleanup and doging and burning.
>
> Make sure whatever you pick supports it though. Photoshop does.
>
> Tom
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <DAVDOU9211@xxxxxxx>
> To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Friday, December 22, 2000 4:10 PM
> Subject: [OM] Re Digital Vs Traditional Photography
>
> > The question occurs to me: Does not a digital camera in most ways dictate
> > the color palet of the end result? Or is that to be manipulated by the
> > computer associated with the digital camera?
> >
> > When one buys film one can buy various types to achieve various
> saturations
> > and tonalities. A very subjective area to be sure, but never the less a
> > reality.
> >
> > If I buy a $2000 E-10 do I need to buy $350 worth of "PhotoShop" in order
> to
> > be able to achieve the palet I want vs, buying, for example, Portra vs
> Gold
> > and shooting them with proper exposure in my OM-2?
> >
> > Dave Dougherty
> >
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|