Subject: | Re: [OM] Zuiko 300/4.5: price, opinions, etc.... |
---|---|
From: | Chris Barker <imagopus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Fri, 22 Dec 2000 19:15:51 +0100 |
RichIt is worth mentioning I think that your emails come out very small on my machine (a Mac with Eudora as email client). This means that I often don't bother to read it because of the size (and my advanced age (46) and eye performance ;-)). If this is not a problem for you or anyone else... fine, but I thought that I would mention it in case you did not know. Happy Christmas Chris One more thing.... just a thought, James. Maybe, just maybe... having a Zuiko 300 instead of a Tamron or some other name, might just bring more money down the road, should you ever (gulp) consider selling your OM gear. UNLESS... the Tamron turns out to be a clearly superior lens (and having a better f-stop doesn't make it so, I don't think... I'm kind of a beginner here, but am getting the idea from reading the list here lately that f-stop ain't everything). Some damn sharp fellas on the list. Hope they help you. Rich -- ~~~~~ ><> Chris Barker mailto:chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx mailto:chris_barker@xxxxxxxxx |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [OM][OT], Timpe, Jim |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Open Letter to Olympus, dlau |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Zuiko 300/4.5: price, opinions, etc...., Doggre |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Zuiko 300/4.5: price, opinions, etc...., Winsor Crosby |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |