On 19 Dec 2000, at 11:58, Kelton Rhoads wrote:
Subject: [OM] A Sister? No, but . . .
Date sent: Tue, 19 Dec 2000 11:58:35 -0800
From: Kelton Rhoads <krho@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Olympus List" <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Send reply to: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>>So finish the story. Did you grow up to marry Kim or her sister...
>
> >>Neither - I married a woman 1) beautiful enough to be a model 2)
> >>tolerant enough to sanction my collecting, and 3) independent enough
> >>to purchase her own camera. (She's the one with the Nikon 950.) I
> >>could marry a Nikon and be happy, but never a Minolta. The Olympus
> >>was spoken for long ago.
> >
> >Errrk! Does SHE have a sister?
> >Andrew
>
> No, Andrew, but she does have a tall and handsome brother who is
> unmarried, if you're open-minded about such things. However, he is a
> Canon user, and as a psychologist, I feel I should warn you that this
> might cause problems in your relationship.
>
ROTFLMAO
geo2
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|