Subject: | Re: [OM] TOPE 4 initial launch final call for submissions... |
---|---|
From: | Gregg Iverson <giverson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Tue, 12 Dec 2000 19:57:01 -0500 |
You wrote: That's because the media isn't involved in the process of film counting. When they report preliminary and unofficial results we can be sure of nothing. They haven't learned the meaning of "don't count your chickens before they hatch".: Olaf- : : Not being a US citizen, you may be unaware that the Florida Supreme : Court and the US Supreme Court are currently in the process of : extending the deadline for Tope, so that no chad, er um, negative : will remain uncounted!. I wouldn't c*unt on that! Unlike the archaeological excavations that you call c*unting machines, the equipment we use in the Netherlands is dead on, just like, uhm, the c*unters in our beloved OM bodies! Have you ever seen an OM that moves its c*nter from 24 back to 13, then forward to 35, then again two frames back to 33 to have it finally sent for examination to a Grand Jury lead by John Hermanson and Mr. Maitani himself, to decide if the end of the film is reached??? Gregg < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | RE: [OM] What went wrong?, Brian P. Huber |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Aerial Photography [OT], W. J. Liles |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] TOPE 4 initial launch final call for submissions..., Barry B. Bean |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] TOPE 4 initial launch final call for submissions..., frieder . faig |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |