Frieder;
I was going for the fastest available for shooting under ambient light in my
church's sanctuary during an evening service. The pictures turned out
decent but not tremendous. I'll keep messing around with this camera and
the large assortment of lenses I got and see what seems to work the best.
>From what some other listees have said, I may actually be able to make a
killing on this stuff if I were willing to let it go to some of the Japanese
adherents to the P*ntax mantra.
Thanks for the input,
Jim
-----Original Message-----
From: frieder.faig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:frieder.faig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2000 8:53 AM
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [OM] OM
Jim,
I think the LX was prefered by people which thought OM's are too small for a
camera at all...
About the glass... When I look at alll the tests I have, I can say, you
picked
the down zenit of worst Pentax glass, the 1.2/50 and 2.5/200.
Try the 2/85, 2.8/100 and 4/50 Macro, They are top of the best lens
categories.
Frieder Faig
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|