I think I've mentioned this before on list, but I actually like to
keep a skylight filter on my lenses, with an appropriate (ie no
vignetting) metal lens hood attached. I don't put a cap over the lens
hood.
Working from my camera bag therefore, lens changing is easy, in that
I only need to swap rear caps from the news lens onto the back of the
one coming off the body (and they are all std size OM) . I know there
is great debate about filters degrading images etc, but I insist
on....
lens hood ALWAYS used
lens hood as deep as possible (without vignetting)
I have never been prepared to place lenses in my camera bag without a
front cap if they didn't have BOTH a lens hood and a filter. Usually
the lens hood is deep enough to protect the filter from fingers etc,
but I certainly wouldn't risk a "naked" front element, with or
without a hood. I generally carry each lens face down in its own
padded-wall section of my bags, resting on the front rim of their
metal lens hood (hence my comment about rubber deforming shape)
Therefore, my only option (if assuming not using a filter) would be
to use a lens cap, which means mounting and removing lens hood every
time I change lenses. Yuck ! Much more risk of dropping something
and/or missing a shot while you fumble around.
Plus, even though bayonet hoods are pretty neat (eg 35-80/2.8) I
don't like reversing them over the lens for storage/carrying as they
can scratch the barrel of the lens. I probably "molly-coddle" my OM
babies in that I am very particular about how I use them/store them/
carry them etc , but the upside is that my (now) 12-13yr old
lenses/bodies/etc look as good as the day I bought them new.
The OM teles and zooms with built-in sliding hoods I store/carry with
the hood collapsed and a lens cap fitted. Same with the 18/3.5 - I
have the 49-72 adapt permanently fitted and use a 72mm lens cap.
This lens hood and filter system (and no front lens cap) works well
for me, maybe not for others.
cheers
peter
FWIW, I actually don't like using the rubber hoods - I tend to
prefer rummaging thru "odds and sodds" boxes at camera shops and
finding metal screw in hoods (making sure to check for vignetting).
At about $2 a piece, I but whatever I can find and then play around
when get home and try on various lenses. Obviously you want
shallower, more widely flared lens hoods for WA lenses, narrower
and longer for teles.
The metal hoods (I feel) give more protection to the lens in my
camera bag, and are more effective in shading the front element.
Also, if you lie a lens with fitted rubber lens hood down on its
side (eg in your carry bag) you will notice that sometimes the
rubber doesn't spring back to a perfectly round shape, but remains
slightly deformed. This could interfere with the view of the lens.
just my (Australian) $0.02 worth.
cheers
peter
I think that lens shades are the one big screw up that Maitani made.
If you have ever used bayonet lens shades, anything else is just
primitive. If Oly can do it on the lens cap, why not the shade?
Winsor
--
Winsor Crosby
Long Beach, California, USA
mailto:wincros@xxxxxxxxxxx
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|