> > "C.H.Ling" <chling@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Subject: Re: [OM] E10 in hand
> >
> > A $500 film scanner can do a much better job than a $2000 DC. Also,
> > you will miss the 16, 18, 21, 24mm lenses.
Here's a URL to a comparison of the new Canon digital to the same camera
brand and lens using Provia F. The silver halide picture was scanned using a
Imacon scanner. The surprising result is that the digital Canon photo was
basically tied or slightly better than the Provia F (noted as a very fine
grained film). But as CH Ling said you will miss the 16 through 24 range
because of the 1.6x mulitplicaiton factor from the small CCD or CMOS.
<A HREF="http://www.luminous-landscape.com/d30_vs_film.htm";>D30 Vs Film</A>
Also there doesn't seem to be any "bucket problem" as noted before on this
list. Maybe this is because of the telephoto lens used, which if the rear
element is far from the film plane (or CMOS plane) should not have as much of
an effect.
Warren
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|