ah, that might have the advantage of data back, but no double exposure
lever - a must for mixed lighting conditions!
----- Original Message -----
From: Gary Edwards <garyetx@xxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, November 20, 2000 7:49 PM
Subject: Re: [OM] Re: OM-2000
> Gries,
>
> May I humbly suggest that for your work, as you describe it, an OM-1N
would
> be more suited - and then you could have a data back and mirror lockup.
>
> Gary Edwards
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: gries <gries@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Monday, November 20, 2000 8:43 AM
> Subject: Re: [OM] Re: OM-2000
>
>
> > yes, the OM-2000 is my new friend!
> >
> > the fact that it is fully manual and will work w/o any batteries is a
> dream
> > come true! most of my work is architectural, so I do all of my metering
> > through an ambient meter.
> >
> > also the mirror lock-up is what I have been dreaming about to reduce any
> > un-necessary camera vibration. all around it seems to be a good camera
> and
> > I would highly recomend it to anyone!
> >
> > i just wish the back were more sturdy.... or if I could have a record
data
> > back....
> >
> >
> > < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
> >
>
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|