Was someone here looking for a new replacement main capacitor for their QA
310 flash? I vaguely remember such a request. Please contact me off list
at omtech@xxxxxxxxx
John Hermanson
___________________________________
Camtech, Olympus Service since 1977.
21 South Lane, Huntington NY 11743-4714
631-424-2121 http://www.zuiko.com
Free Olympus Manuals: 1-800-221-3000
___________________________________
----- Original Message -----
From: "C.H.Ling" <chling@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2000 11:41 AM
Subject: Re: [OM] Scanning - prints or negatives?
| Check the sample scan from hamrick's page, the scan from Polaroid and
LS2000
| didn't make much different. You may argue the Kodak Q60's resolution is
not
| good. I also have tried an ISO 100 negative and a slide on two different
| Polaroid 4000, both look not much different with my LS2000's scan (may be
| very very little better). Being a semi-digital pro that demanding an
| affordable higher resolution scanner, that is the major reason why I
didn't
| change from LS2000 to Polaroid. The quoted resolution is no everything,
the
| system MTF of a 4000dpi scanner (at 4000dpi) may be much lower than a
| 2700dpi one (at 2700dpi).
|
| Just hoping for the coming Kodak 3600dpi scanner will do better.
|
| One word for the Vuescan, its ICE cleaning performance is not as good as
the
| Nikon's original software. Also, for slide scanning, nothing beat the
Nikon
| for color accuracy (also with Nikon's original software).
|
| C.H.Ling
|
| ----- Original Message -----
| From: "Chip Stratton" <cstrat@xxxxxxxxxx>
| To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
| Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2000 8:06 AM
| Subject: RE: [OM] Scanning - prints or negatives?
|
|
| > As a Nikon LS-2000 user, formerly an HP Photosmart S20 user, I must say
| that
| > the 'Digital Ice' dust removal of the LS-2000 is a killer feature. While
| it
| > won't totally remove big chunks of dust or dirt, it gets rid of the
usual
| > stuff so well that manual spot touch-up is almost never required after
| > scanning. A BIG timesaver.
| >
| > On the other hand, if you are going to print larger than 12"x18", the
| extra
| > dpi of the Polaroid Sprintscan 4000 will certainly prove it's worth.
| >
| > Chip Stratton
| > cstrat@xxxxxxxxx
| >
| >
| > < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
| > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
| > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
| >
|
|
|
|
|
|
| < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
| < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
| < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|
|
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|