Still can't beat the Olympus 35RC, it's 410g, with the lens! And someone
reported that the lens could get 80+ mm center resolution form f/5.6 to
f/16.
On Mon, 30 Oct 2000 21:45:41 -0600 Charles Packard <packardc@xxxxxxxxxx>
writes:
> My first thoughts are either a OMPC or OM2000 might fit your needs.
> But after a bit of research on the SIF site you would't be saving
> much
> in weight.
> OM-2(n) - 520g
> OM-PC(40)- 460g
> OM2000 - 430g
> The OM-PC(40) has a metering system that rivals the OM-2n. I know I
> have
> both. The OM2000 has a very good spot metering system but I have
> strong
> doubts as to its durability, especially on the trail. I don't have
> much
> knowledge about P&S's but I have heard very good comments about the
> Stylus Epic 35mm f/2.8 and it is considerably lighter than any of
> the
> above bodies.
>
> Hans Veluwen's OM SIF site:
> http://members.nbci.com/_XMCM/veluwen/om-sif.htm
>
> -Charles Packard
>
> John M Gaasland wrote:
> >
> > I'm sure this has been covered sometime in the past, but I'm
> looking for
> > something lighter than my OM2n to go into the mountains with,
> weight is a
> > factor. Was wondering what light camera would be good? Perhaps an
> Olympus
> > RC? Thanks! John Gaasland, Olympia, WA
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
>^..^<
MAGGIE
LIVES!!!
________________________________________________________________
YOU'RE PAYING TOO MUCH FOR THE INTERNET!
Juno now offers FREE Internet Access!
Try it today - there's no risk! For your FREE software, visit:
http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj.
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|