ML Archiv: Re: [OM] filtered or unfiltered

Subject:	Re: [OM] filtered or unfiltered
From:	"Giles" <cnocbui@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Mon, 30 Oct 2000 22:45:58 +0000

Polariser?   ;-)

Giles

Jim Couch wrote:

> Neutral Density filters.

> when you need one, nothing else works!

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: [OM] filtered or unfiltered, (continued) Re: [OM] filtered or unfiltered, lclark Re: [OM] filtered or unfiltered, - DORIS FANG - Re: [OM] filtered or unfiltered, Chris Barker Re: [OM] filtered or unfiltered, Mickey Trageser Re: [OM] filtered or unfiltered, - DORIS FANG - Re: [OM] filtered or unfiltered, Mickey Trageser Re: [OM] filtered or unfiltered, - DORIS FANG - XA's (Was: [OM] filtered or unfiltered), Alan Barrow Re: XA's (Was: [OM] filtered or unfiltered), Chris Barker Re: [OM] filtered or unfiltered, Jim Couch Re: [OM] filtered or unfiltered, Giles <= Re: [OM] filtered or unfiltered, Jim Couch Re: [OM] F1.2 Zuiko Lenses, frieder . faig Re: [OM] F1.2 Zuiko Lenses, Giles

Previous by Date:	Re: [OM] Please don't fragment the list!!!! Was: "For Sale" mai, Giles
Next by Date:	RE: [OM] Scanning - prints or negatives?, jowilcox
Previous by Thread:	Re: [OM] filtered or unfiltered, Jim Couch
Next by Thread:	Re: [OM] filtered or unfiltered, Jim Couch
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]