| Subject: | Re: [OM][ot] compression was Digital OM |
|---|---|
| From: | Acer V <siddim01@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 29 Oct 2000 13:05:52 -0800 (PST) |
what about wavelet compression? from what i've seen (www.luratech.com) it seems like that might solve the problem. surely there's a tradeoff, but what is it? /Acer V -- dum spiro, spero http://student.ucr.edu/~siddim01 < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] E-Groups ?, offline & filtering, Eric Goodell |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [OM] Subscribers numbers up... WAS FS..., Keith Berry |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Digital OM, HI100 |
| Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: Mike's F1 Olympus cars....., Dirk Wright |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |