Subject: | Re: [OM] Current film color balance (was: OT? Film vs. Digital) |
---|---|
From: | Chris Barker <imagopus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Sat, 28 Oct 2000 16:09:52 +0200 |
Are you sure that this was the film's fault and not the inaccuracy of
the printing machine? I often feel hard done by when my prints
return in strange colours. When it's important I send it back to the
processor for another look at the colour balance.
Chris Looks like we have the same problem... I shot a couple of rolls of Kodak Royal Gold outside last weekend, simple things of my kids and my trees in the backyard etc. Overall I was pleased at how things looked considering it was such a dull day, but some of the skin tones were terrible. The strange thing is, my daughter looked great, but my son and son-in-law were way too saturated and way too red. It's a new one on me - Shooting flash fill outside on a gray day and ending up too warm... Hey, the trees looked wonderful though. The ++red made them a very dark green. :-) -- <|_:-)_|> Chris Barker imagopus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ... a nascent photo library. < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] thought on e-groups (was "For Sale" mailing list), Chris Barker |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] [OT] Scanners, Gregg Iverson |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Current film color balance (was: OT? Film vs.Digital), Jim Sharp |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Current film color balance (was: OT? Film vs. Digital), Jim Sharp |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |