>>Did you look at the macro shot of the water drops with 80/4 and 90/2? To me
>>one of them is certainly more pleasing than the other. If that extra
>>dimension is bokeh, so be it.
>>
>
>Well, yeah, I saw it alright. It's much coarser on the 80/4 lens. I just
>thought that the 80/4 was intended for macro shots only, so maybe bokeh
>wasn't important to the designers. Also, the difference in depth of field
>between the 80 and 90mm lenses probably played a role here....
>Be Seeing You.
>Dirk Wright
Doesn't the 90 have lots more aperture blades? I thought that was the
difference (nice, round diaphragm hole, like a leica).
Andrew
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|